Asus has polished its Zen UI further, but it's a custom skin layered over Google's Android 5.0 Lollipop. Since its introduction last year, Zen UI features a flat minimalist look. Features from the earlier iteration return, such as Do It Later, a handy reminder app that helps you keep track of SMSes to reply to, articles to read and missed calls to return. Like Chinese smartphone maker Xiaomi's MIUI, Zen UI also features the ability to change your phone's theme, so if you don't like the current look, you can swap it to something you'd prefer. Another fun thing you can do is change the color of the fonts on your phone -- this works if you prefer a lighter background wallpaper -- you can then use a darker color for your fonts so that it shows up. New features include drawing on the screen when the phone is locked to activate features called ZenMotion and a guest mode for when you need to pass the phone over to a friend to use (though you'll need to make sure you password lock your phone first so they can't switch it back and access your data!).

The Bad The phone has a cheap bulky feel and an unintuitive button layout, Its non-swappable battery delivers only decent life, The price is too high for its above-average capabilities, The Bottom Line The Asus ZenFone 2 is too expensive for its above-average ability, but if the price agrees with you, the smooth performance and splendid low-light camera won't disappoint, Be respectful, keep it civil and stay on topic, We delete comments that violate our policy, which we encourage you to read, Discussion threads can be closed at any time at iphone 6s / 6 olixar sentinel case and glass screen protector our discretion..

In 2011, Apple filed a lawsuit against Samsung, accusing it of violating several patents in the design of its mobile devices. Apple won the trial in 2012, with the jury awarding it $1.05 billion in damages. In March 2013, US District Court Judge Lucy Koh whittled $450.5 million off those damages, but in November a jury awarded Apple an additional $290.5 million in damages, ultimately adding up to about $930 million. Samsung appealed the decision, and on Monday, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit released its ruling, Reuters reported. The appeals court upheld the violations that concerned design patents but struck down the ones over trade dress, a legal term that refers to the way a product is packaged or presented.

As a result, the $382 million awarded for those violations will have to now be reconsidered by a lower court, Assuming the lower court finds in favor of Samsung over the issue, the Korean company would have to fork over just $548 million in damages to Apple, "We iphone 6s / 6 olixar sentinel case and glass screen protector are pleased the Federal Circuit Court of Appeal confirmed Samsung blatantly copied Apple products," an Apple spokesman said, "This is a victory for design and those who respect it, Even though Samsung must pay for its widespread infringement of our patents, this case has always been about more than money, It's about innovation and the hard work that goes into inventing products that people love, which is hard to put a price on."The ruling was viewed differently by Samsung..

"We welcome the US Court of Appeals' ruling overturning Apple's infringement and damage claims against Samsung over trade dress," a Samsung spokesman said. "Today's decision shows that Apple's claims over trade dress and damages lack merit and are grossly exaggerated. We remain confident that our products do not infringe on Apple's design patents and other intellectual property, and we will continue to take all appropriate measures to protect our products. For decades, we have heavily invested in pioneering the development of technological innovations in the mobile industry, which have been a cornerstone for all our products."For years, Apple and Samsung have battled each other not just in the technology market but in the courtroom. The two have spent considerable time and resources suing and countersuing each other over alleged patent violations of their respective mobile products. Apple's suits are indirectly aimed at Android as Google's mobile operating system has come to dominate the smartphone arena. As such, Apple's legal salvos are one attempt to slow the momentum of Android by trying to convince the courts to lend a hand.